1[2 {3 "query": "should I add integration tests for the SsoController change, or are unit tests enough?",4 "should_trigger": true5 },6 {7 "query": "what's the right test strategy for the billing webhook handler, testing trophy or pyramid?",8 "should_trigger": true9 },10 {11 "query": "which layer should the passkey enrollment validation test live at: unit, component, or E2E?"
15 "query": "PM-32009 is the item-types import/export work. recommend which tests to add and at which layer for it.",
16 "should_trigger": true
17 },
18 {
19 "query": "the coverage report for the org-vault export epic lists several behaviors with no automated tests. which layer should each new test target?",
20 "should_trigger": true
21 },
22 {
23 "query": "I've got a Testmo CSV of manual cases for the vault-unlock rework. which of these should be automated and at which layer?",
24 "should_trigger": true
25 },
26 {
27 "query": "the autofill refactor PR in bitwarden/clients has gaps. where should the new tests go to keep the pre-merge gate deterministic?",
28 "should_trigger": true
29 },
30 {
31 "query": "do we need an E2E for the billing upgrade flow, or can component tests cover it?",
32 "should_trigger": true
33 },
34 {
35 "query": "recommend a test layering for the emergency-access revamp so the pipeline can gate on it",
36 "should_trigger": true
37 },
38 {
39 "query": "what's the lowest layer that can own the CipherService.RestoreAsync validation logic?",
40 "should_trigger": true
41 },
42 {
43 "query": "which behaviors in bitwarden/server PR 6001, the billing webhook handler, already have test coverage today?",
44 "should_trigger": false
45 },
46 {
47 "query": "write manual Gherkin test cases for PM-35944 that I can import into Testmo",
48 "should_trigger": false
49 },
50 {
51 "query": "write the unit tests for the new CipherService.RestoreAsync method",
52 "should_trigger": false
53 },
54 {
55 "query": "the sync E2E in bitwarden/test keeps timing out in CI, help me fix the flaky test",
56 "should_trigger": false
57 },
58 {
59 "query": "run the jest suite for bitwarden/clients and tell me which specs are failing",
60 "should_trigger": false
61 },
62 {
63 "query": "refactor these xUnit tests to use the new shared fixture pattern",
64 "should_trigger": false
65 },
66 {
67 "query": "review bitwarden/server PR 5821 for bugs and security issues before I approve it",
68 "should_trigger": false
69 },
70 {
71 "query": "what's the overall code-coverage percentage on bitwarden/server right now?",
72 "should_trigger": false
73 },
74 {
75 "query": "what test coverage already exists for the surfaces in the emergency-access revamp Tech Breakdown doc (bitwarden/tech-breakdowns)?",
76 "should_trigger": false
77 },
78 {
79 "query": "explain how the testing trophy works and when you'd pick it over a pyramid",