README

These evaluations ensure the Meeting Intelligence skill:

• Gathers context from Notion workspace
• Enriches with Codex research appropriately
• Creates both internal pre-reads and external agendas
• Distinguishes between Notion facts and Codex insights
• Works consistently across Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus

Evaluation Files

decision-meeting-prep.json

Tests preparation for a decision-making meeting.

Scenario: Prep for database migration decision meeting
Key Behaviors:

• Searches Notion for migration context (specs, discussions, options)
• Fetches 2-3 relevant pages
• Enriches with Codex research (decision frameworks, migration best practices)
• Creates comprehensive internal pre-read with recommendation
• Creates clean, professional external agenda
• Clearly distinguishes Notion facts from Codex insights
• Cross-links both documents

status-meeting-prep.json

Tests preparation for a status update or review meeting.

Scenario: Prep for project status review
Key Behaviors:

• Gathers project metrics and progress from Notion
• Fetches relevant pages (roadmap, tasks, milestones)
• Adds Codex context (industry benchmarks, best practices)
• Creates internal pre-read with honest assessment
• Creates external agenda with structured flow
• Includes source citations using mention-page tags
• Time-boxes agenda items

Running Evaluations

1. Enable the meeting-intelligence skill
2. Submit the query from the evaluation file
3. Verify the skill searches Notion first (not Codex research)
4. Check that TWO documents are created (internal + external)
5. Verify Codex enrichment adds value without replacing Notion content
6. Test with Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus

Expected Skill Behaviors

Meeting Intelligence evaluations should verify:

Notion Context Gathering

• Searches workspace for relevant context first
• Fetches specific pages (not generic)
• Extracts key information from Notion content
• Cites sources using mention-page tags

Codex Research Integration

• Adds industry context, frameworks, or best practices
• Enrichment is relevant and valuable (not filler)
• Clearly distinguishes Notion facts from Codex insights
• Research complements (doesn’t replace) Notion content

Two-Document Creation

• Internal Pre-Read: Comprehensive, includes strategy, recommendations, detailed pros/cons
• External Agenda: Professional, focused on meeting flow, no internal strategy
• Both documents are clearly labeled
• Documents are cross-linked

Document Quality

• Pre-read follows structure: Overview → Background → Current Status → Context & Insights → Discussion Points
• Agenda follows structure: Details → Objective → Agenda Items (with times) → Decisions → Actions → Resources
• Titles include date or meeting context
• Content is actionable and meeting-ready

Creating New Evaluations

When adding Meeting Intelligence evaluations:

1. Test different meeting types - Decision, status, brainstorm, 1:1, sprint planning, retrospective
2. Vary complexity - Simple updates vs. complex strategic decisions
3. Test with/without Notion content - Rich workspace vs. minimal existing pages
4. Verify enrichment value - Is Codex research genuinely helpful?
5. Check internal/external distinction - Is sensitive info kept in pre-read only?

Example Success Criteria

Good (specific, testable):

• “Creates TWO documents (internal pre-read + external agenda)”
• “Internal pre-read marked ‘INTERNAL ONLY’ or ‘For team only’”
• “Cites at least 2-3 Notion pages using mention-page tags”
• “Agenda includes time allocations for each section”
• “Codex enrichment includes decision frameworks or best practices”

Bad (vague, untestable):

• “Creates meeting materials”
• “Gathers context effectively”
• “Prepares well”