Subchapter 15.3
references/story-design.mdMarkdown20 KBView on GitHub
Use this reference in Step 3 to write STORYBOARD.md and SCRIPT.md for a faceless explainer — a topic, concept, how-to, listicle, or narrative explainer built from text, with no product, no website, and no captured assets.
This file defines the story: what the video teaches, in what order, and why each frame exists. It does not define layout, visual effects, animation, or final markdown schemas. For exact file syntax, follow ../hyperframes/references/storyboard-format.md and ../hyperframes/references/script-format.md.
Read these inputs before writing:
hyperframes.json — locked brief: angle, length, aspect ratio, language.frame.md — tone, mood, design system, and register.capture/extracted/visible-text.txt — the article / notes / topic / brief (the source of information).user_script.txt and VO_MODE, when the user pasted a script.There is no asset-descriptions.md and no capture/assets/ to inspect — this is faceless. Every visual is invented downstream (Steps 4-5); your job here is the narrative, not a visual asset list.
Create two files:
STORYBOARD.md — the teaching plan, one frame per beat.SCRIPT.md — the locked narration, only for spoken frames.Every storyboard frame must include the required fields from the storyboard format reference, plus the narrative metadata below.
An article is an information dump. A video is a guided act of understanding.
Do not follow paragraph order. Reorder, merge, omit, and compress the source text into a clear teaching sequence. Strip the asides; surface the spine. The single most common failure is paraphrasing the article in order — do not do that. The input text is the source of information, not a story template.
From the brief and text, identify:
Write the storyboard around the thesis, not around the article’s sections.
Use frame.md as a soft guide — the visual system tunes the voice, not the structure:
frame.md signal | Story effect |
|---|---|
| warm, handmade, notes-like | plain, considered, low-hype; humane |
| bold, poster-like, declarative | short punchy beats, confident claims |
| friendly, polished, modern | approachable direct address, lighter |
| literary, technical-but-human | thoughtful, precise; safe for code/dev |
The teaching truth decides the arc. The visual system tunes the voice.
Pick one structure (or explicitly name a compound). Do not splice phases from different structures — each is a complete path through understanding.
| Structure | “It is…” | Use when the payload is… | Body shape |
|---|---|---|---|
concept-explainer | “what is X, and why does it matter” | one idea/term/phenomenon the audience half-knows | name concept → reveal mechanism layer by layer → land implication |
how-to-process | “here is how to do / how X works,” ordered steps | a procedure or mechanism with a clear start→finish | a 3-6 step sequence on a consistent visual stage, one move each |
listicle | “N things about X” | a set of parallel, co-equal items (tips, mistakes, reasons) | hook → N roughly co-equal items → wrap; rule-of-three is strongest |
story-explainer | teach through a narrative arc | case studies, histories, cautionary tales | setup → tension → turn → resolution → lesson; the lesson generalizes |
Choosing: one idea to understand → concept; an ordered procedure → how-to; parallel co-equal items → listicle; a concrete narrative/case → story.
Compounds layer an outer arc with an inner rhythm — e.g. concept-explainer with process (ordered steps inside the mechanism phase), story-explainer with how-to. Set arc in the frontmatter to the chosen structure (or <outer> with <inner>). The downstream visual phase reads it for pacing: a process inner rhythm means tighter seams on a consistent stage and shorter frames.
Each frame needs one clear job. Avoid frames that only say “more detail” or “another point.”
For every frame, define (use the storyboard format’s fields, with these narrative additions in the frame’s metadata + prose):
type — one of hook | pain_point | product_intro | feature_showcase | benefit_highlight | social_proof | branding | cta. This enum is shared with the downstream visual layer for pacing; repurpose it for teaching per the mapping below.persuasion — a named rhetorical / clarity technique (see catalog), not “explain the idea.”beat — the target feeling (see vocabulary).scene — a one-line visual idea, not detailed composition.voiceover — spoken guide text, or empty for silent frames.transition_in — a registry transition name (see Transitions).blueprint (optional candidate) — consult the role→blueprint menu in ../hyperframes-animation/blueprints-index.md; when a proven shape fits this beat, tag its id (a tag, not a commitment — Step 4 confirms or overrides). Then write the voiceover in the shape that blueprint implies, so the line is reveal-ready before Step 4 ever runs. Teaching truth still decides which beats exist — never invent, drop, or bend a beat just to fit a shape; omit blueprint and write the line plainly when none fits.In the prose under each frame, state:
narrativeRole — the scene’s job in the explanation (e.g. “Concretizes compound interest as a snowball,” not “Shows a chart”).keyMessage — the one thing the viewer should understand after this frame (one sentence).The enum is shared with the downstream visual layer; map your explainer roles onto it so downstream pacing matches the frame’s job:
| Explainer role you want | Use type | Why this value |
|---|---|---|
| Hook / curiosity gap | hook | The high-leverage opening 3-5s. |
| Pain / problem / why-care | pain_point | The friction or gap the explanation resolves. |
| Name the core concept | product_intro | “Introduce the protagonist” — here the protagonist is the idea. |
| Mechanism / step / item | feature_showcase | A unit of the body — one move of a process, one mechanism, one item. |
| Implication / payoff / “so what” | benefit_highlight | The consequence or value of understanding. |
| Evidence / example / data point | social_proof | A concrete grounding: a number, a worked example, a comparison. |
| Thesis / takeaway / principle | branding | The philosophical landing — the generalizable idea, the one line. |
| Call to think / try / act | cta | The closing ask — try it, watch for it, question it. |
The body is usually a run of feature_showcase (steps/mechanisms/items), interleaved with benefit_highlight (implications) and social_proof (examples/data). At least one feature_showcase or product_intro should exist (every explainer has a body and a named idea).
Pick one opening strategy for the first 3-5 seconds. For explainers the hook opens a cognitive gap or stakes:
| Strategy | Use when | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Shocking statistic | A credible number quantifies the stakes. | “90% of plastic ever made has never been recycled.” |
| Rhetorical question | Create an immediate cognitive gap. | “Why does time seem to speed up as you get older?” |
| Counterintuitive claim | The truth contradicts common belief. | “Adding more lanes to a highway makes traffic worse.” |
| Pain validation | The audience already feels the confusion. | “Everyone says ‘just diversify’ — nobody says what that means.” |
| Visceral metaphor | The idea is abstract and needs to become concrete. | “Your attention is a spotlight, and apps fight over the switch.” |
| Concept announcement | The term itself is the subject; make it memorable. | “There’s a word for this: the bystander effect.” |
| Direct address | The audience is clearly defined. | “If you’ve ever rage-quit a recipe halfway — this is for you.” |
| Imagine / scenario | A thought experiment frames the whole piece. | “Imagine money that loses value if you don’t spend it.” |
| Stakes / consequence | The “why care now” is a real cost or risk. | “Get this one step wrong and the whole batch is ruined.” |
The hook must create curiosity, tension, or stakes. Do not open with a generic definition. Per ../hyperframes-creative/references/story-spine.md: the hook speaks the viewer’s language (the payoff of understanding, never the source text’s section headings), and the thesis (message) lands by beat 2 — the explanation after that is its evidence.
persuasion is a named technique — how this frame makes the idea land or clear — not a vague intent. Combine when several are active (e.g. “Analogy + progressive disclosure”).
| Family | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Make-concrete | Analogy / metaphor · Concretization (abstract → tangible object) · Worked example with real numbers · Anchoring on a familiar referent |
| Reveal-in-order | Progressive disclosure (one term/layer at a time) · Build-up (simple → general case) · Signposting (“first… then… finally”) |
| Contrast | Before/after · Common-belief vs reality · Comparison of two options · Counterexample (here is when it breaks) |
| Structure | Rule of three · Numbered enumeration · Question→answer pairing · Frame-then-fill (state the shape, then populate it) |
| Evidence | Statistical proof · Citation / source · Demonstration (show the mechanism running) · Causal chain (A → B → C) |
| Memory & landing | Callback (return to the hook’s image) · Distillation (compress to one line) · Coined term / mnemonic · Generalization (specific → principle) |
When no catalog technique fits, name a new one inline and explain its mechanism (e.g. “Subtractive framing: define the concept by what it is not first”). Never write generic “explain the idea.”
beat is one word or a short compound phrase (e.g. “Curiosity and clarity”). Avoid generic “positive” / “interested.” Explainers ride a comprehension arc:
Compound beats are often strongest, e.g. “Surprise + recognition”, “Comprehension + delight.”
An explainer’s core is almost always 3-6 body frames on a consistent visual stage, each advancing one mechanism / step / item / layer, building understanding cumulatively. A single isolated body frame rarely teaches anything.
product_intro) → reveal the mechanism layer by layer (a run of feature_showcase, interleaving benefit_highlight for “so what” and social_proof for a grounding example).feature_showcase per step, ordered, on one stage. Carry the object being acted on across adjacent steps (see Continuity).feature_showcase per item; items are parallel, so default to cut / push-slide between them.pain_point for tension, branding for the lesson).This framework builds one frame per worker — there is no “continue run” that hands several frames to one worker. A sequence of frames reads as one continuous shot through two storyboard-level levers, both yours:
scene so Step 4 and the workers keep the stage stable.push-slide <DIR> for ordered steps, crossfade for a soft layer reveal) and repeat it across the run, so the frames feel like one flow rather than separate slides.When a single element genuinely transforms between two ideas (a diagram node becomes a chart bar, a formula becomes its result), keep it within one frame as a development beat (entrance → the transform → settle) rather than splitting it across a seam — the worker owns that motion. Note the intent in the frame’s scene / narrative; Step 4 turns it into a time-coded shot sequence (instantiating the candidate blueprint).
Use only registry transition names in transition_in:
cut | crossfade | blur-crossfade | push-slide LEFT | push-slide RIGHT | push-slide UP | push-slide DOWN | zoom-through | squeeze
Pick 2-3 transition types for the whole video and repeat them. Frame 1 uses cut as a placeholder (there is no previous frame). Match the seam to the narrative: ordered steps → a consistent push-slide; a soft layer reveal or atmosphere shift → crossfade / blur-crossfade; zooming into a detail or pulling back → zoom-through; a clean topic switch or new list item → cut.
Every visual is invented downstream from each frame’s narrativeRole / keyMessage / scene — typography, abstract graphics, diagrams, data-viz are all first-class. Therefore:
asset_candidates line describing intended diagrams or typography as if they were files. Visual intent belongs in scene + narrativeRole; the visual phase reads those.public/<basename>. Then add one line asset_candidates: public/<basename> — <≤25 words: what it is>. Never invent paths or reference capture/.Write tight per-frame narration:
Avoid: “Unlock the power of…”, “Seamless experience”, long noun-phrase lists, a frame that is only a filler bridge (“Or…”).
Silent frames are allowed and common in explainers — a diagram assembling itself, a worked example animating, a beat of held tension before a turn. Set voiceover empty and leave the frame out of SCRIPT.md; then narrativeRole + persuasion must carry what the script doesn’t say.
Treat user_script.txt as source material. Rewrite, reorder, merge, or omit to fit the chosen structure and target length.
Do not rewrite the user’s words. Segment the script into frame-sized chunks at sentence or paragraph boundaries (you may split a long sentence at a natural clause boundary, but do not change words). Final duration follows the provided script.
The storyboard’s top YAML block carries a music: field — the BGM mood the audio step retrieves against (e.g. music: confident minimal tech underscore). Omitting it falls back to message: → arc: → a neutral default, so BGM plays unless turned off explicitly.
music: none — BGM off (narration, if any, still runs).music: none + no SCRIPT.md — the canonical fully-silent marker: no narration, no BGM, no SFX. audio.mjs generates nothing and the audio step is a clean skip. Use exactly this spelling when the user asks for a silent / music-free video.Use the exact fields required by the core storyboard format. This is the narrative shape each frame should satisfy:
## Frame N — Short name
- scene: one clear visual idea
- voiceover: "spoken guide text, or empty"
- duration: rough estimate in seconds
- transition_in: crossfade
- status: outline
- src: compositions/frames/NN-short-name.html
- type: feature_showcase
- persuasion: Progressive disclosure
- beat: comprehension
- blueprint: dataviz-countup — candidate shape from the role→blueprint menu; omit when none fits
narrativeRole: What this frame does in the viewer's understanding.
keyMessage: The one idea the viewer should remember.Before asking for user approval, verify:
feature_showcase / benefit_highlight / product_intro), not a single isolated body frame.type, persuasion (a named technique from the catalog), and beat (specific, not generic).voiceover is phrase-segmented into cues (each a piece Step 5 can reveal on), not one run-on clause; a candidate blueprint: is tagged wherever a proven shape fits, and omitted where none does.cut.asset_candidates is absent (faceless) except a real user-supplied public/<basename>.SCRIPT.md contains only locked spoken narration; silent frames are intentional and omitted from it.